Which patient-reported outcomes do rheumatology patients find important to track digitally? A real-world longitudinal study in ArthritisPower
Arthritis Research & Therapy, February 2021
W. Benjamin Nowell, Kelly Gavigan, Carol L. Kannowski, Zhihong Cai, Theresa Hunter, Shilpa Venkatachalam, Julie Birt, Jennifer Workman, Jeffrey R. Curtis
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||13||68%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||11%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||10||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||22||28%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 511,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.