You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enola K Proctor, Byron J Powell, Ana A Baumann, Ashley M Hamilton, Ryan L Santens |
| Abstract |
All investigators seeking funding to conduct implementation research face the challenges of preparing a high-quality proposal and demonstrating their capacity to conduct the proposed study. Applicants need to demonstrate the progressive nature of their research agenda and their ability to build cumulatively upon the literature and their own preliminary studies. Because implementation science is an emerging field involving complex and multilevel processes, many investigators may not feel equipped to write competitive proposals, and this concern is pronounced among early stage implementation researchers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 33% |
| Canada | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Ireland | 6 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 47% |
| Scientists | 36 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 765 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 166 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 119 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 107 | 14% |
| Other | 61 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 6% |
| Other | 172 | 22% |
| Unknown | 111 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 198 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 130 | 17% |
| Psychology | 95 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 116 | 15% |
| Unknown | 159 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#567,475
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#44
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,022
of 192,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.