↓ Skip to main content

Why Professionalism Demands Abolition of Carceral Approaches to Patients' Nonadherence Behaviors.

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Professionalism Demands Abolition of Carceral Approaches to Patients' Nonadherence Behaviors.
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2022
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2022.181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nhi Tran, Aminta Kouyate, Monica U Hahn

Abstract

Some clinicians' and organizations' considerations of how a patient's prior adherence to health recommendations should influence that patient's candidacy for a current intervention express structural racism and carceral bias. When clinical judgment is influenced by racism and carceral logic, patients of color are at risk of having their health services delivered by clinicians in ways that are inappropriately interrogative, aggressive, or punitive. This commentary on a case suggests how an abolitionist approach can help clinicians orient themselves affectively to patients whose health behaviors express or have expressed nonadherence. This article argues that an abolitionist approach is key to facilitating clinicians' understandings of root causes of many patients' nonadherence behaviors and that an abolitionist approach is needed to express basic health professionalism and promote just, antiracist, patient-centered practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%