↓ Skip to main content

Why Restoring Birth as Ceremony Can Promote Health Equity.

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Restoring Birth as Ceremony Can Promote Health Equity.
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2022
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2022.326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marinah V Farrell

Abstract

Until the mid-20th century, birth in the United States for Latinx Indigenous peoples was an ancestral ceremony guided by midwives and traditional healers (parteras curanderas). As American physicians and nurses increasingly differentiated themselves from traditional midwives, midwives of color in particular were disparaged and excluded from helping women give birth and thus from making birth a cultural foothold in their lives. As a result, communities of Latinx Indigenous peoples were culturally and spiritually separated-via the marginalization of parteras-from important health traditions, which caused suffering and illness. Reimplementation of birth as ceremony means babies can be born (and communities reborn) into an ancestral cultural ecology characterized by safety and cultural reclamation of healing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%