↓ Skip to main content

What Are the Right Tools for Studying Arts in Health Interventions?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Are the Right Tools for Studying Arts in Health Interventions?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2022
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2022.617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda B Olson, Stacey Springs, Jay Baruch

Abstract

The arts can touch places that are difficult to recognize and understand, capture in words, or measure by numbers-whether you're an artist, a patient, or an educator. This ineffability presents a dilemma for practitioners and researchers in arts in health when questions of legitimacy, efficacy, program implementation, and research funding are tied to outcomes-based research. Ethical tensions arise when traditional public health and clinical research methods are the wrong tools for capturing what's vital about the arts. This article argues that being a responsible arts in health researcher requires interrogating what counts as evidence, especially when the insistence on rigor risks oversimplifying and diminishing the power of the arts. It further argues for equity in arts in health research, including equity in investigative strategies that value both the arts and the research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%