| Title |
Association Between Soft Drink Consumption and Mortality in 10 European Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2478 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Mullee, Dora Romaguera, Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard, Vivian Viallon, Magdalena Stepien, Heinz Freisling, Guy Fagherazzi, Francesca Romana Mancini, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Tilman Kühn, Rudolf Kaaks, Heiner Boeing, Krasimira Aleksandrova, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjær, Kim Overvad, Elisabete Weiderpass, Guri Skeie, Christine L. Parr, J. Ramón Quirós, Antonio Agudo, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, Lluís Cirera, Eva Ardanaz, Kay-Tee Khaw, Tammy Y. N. Tong, Julie A. Schmidt, Antonia Trichopoulou, Georgia Martimianaki, Anna Karakatsani, Domenico Palli, Claudia Agnoli, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Salvatore Panico, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, W. M. Monique Verschuren, Jolanda M. A. Boer, Roel Vermeulen, Stina Ramne, Emily Sonestedt, Bethany van Guelpen, Pernilla Lif Holgersson, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Alicia K. Heath, David Muller, Elio Riboli, Marc J. Gunter, Neil Murphy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,301 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 282 | 9% |
| Mexico | 228 | 7% |
| Spain | 207 | 6% |
| Colombia | 164 | 5% |
| Japan | 123 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 99 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 90 | 3% |
| India | 51 | 2% |
| Thailand | 44 | 1% |
| Other | 500 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1513 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2709 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 308 | 9% |
| Scientists | 253 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 29 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 435 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 19% |
| Unknown | 136 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 162 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,151
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#11
of 11,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 381,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.