Title |
Changing Memories: Between Ethics and Speculation
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.sect1-1612 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric Racine, William Affleck |
Abstract |
Over the past decade, a debate has emerged between those who believe that memory-modulating technologies are inherently dangerous and need to be regulated and those who believe these technologies present minimal risk and thus view concerns about their use as far-fetched and alarmist. This article tackles three questions central to this debate: (1) Do these technologies jeopardize personhood? (2) Are the risks of these technologies acceptable? (3) Do these technologies require special regulation or oversight? Although concerns about the unethical use of memory-modulating technologies are legitimate, these concerns should not override the responsible use of memory-modulating technologies in clinical contexts. Accordingly, we call for careful comparative analysis of their use on a case-by-case basis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 50% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 33% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 3 | 17% |
Psychology | 3 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 22% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |