↓ Skip to main content

Improving Pathologists’ Communication Skills

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Pathologists’ Communication Skills
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2016
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.medu1-1608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Dintzis

Abstract

The 2015 Institute of Medicine report on diagnostic error has placed a national spotlight on the importance of improving communication among clinicians and between clinicians and patients [1]. The report emphasizes the critical role that communication plays in patient safety and outlines ways that pathologists can support this process. Despite recognition of communication as an essential element in patient care, pathologists currently undergo limited (if any) formal training in communication skills. To address this gap, we at the University of Washington Medical Center developed communication training with the goal of establishing best practice procedures for effective pathology communication. The course includes lectures, role playing, and simulated clinician-pathologist interactions for training and evaluation of pathology communication performance. Providing communication training can help create reliable communication pathways that anticipate and address potential barriers and errors before they happen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%