↓ Skip to main content

Shared Responsibility: Massachusetts Legislators, Physicians, and An Act Relative to Substance Use Treatment, Education, and Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared Responsibility: Massachusetts Legislators, Physicians, and An Act Relative to Substance Use Treatment, Education, and Prevention
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2016
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.pfor2-1609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan Rudder, Lulu Tsao, Helen E Jack

Abstract

Recent passage of the Massachusetts law, An Act Relative to Substance Use, Treatment, Education, and Prevention, represents an admirable public health approach to substance use disorder (SUD), a stigmatized chronic disease that affects some of society's most vulnerable people. With its seven-day supply limit on first-time opioid prescriptions, this legislation takes an unusual approach to state government involvement in health care. By intervening in individual physicians' practices, state legislators have entered a space traditionally reserved for clinical teams. The seven-day supply limit and the process through which it was developed highlight competing priorities and dialogue between physicians and legislators, limits of physician self-regulation, and standards of evidence in policy making and health care. Addressing these issues requires both physicians and legislators to recognize and fulfill new responsibilities in order to better assist the populations they serve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 11%
Linguistics 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 9 50%