↓ Skip to main content

Time-out: The Professional and Organizational Ethics of Speaking Up in the OR

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
45 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-out: The Professional and Organizational Ethics of Speaking Up in the OR
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2016
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.stas1-1609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Berlinger, Elizabeth Dietz

Abstract

Participation in patient safety is one concrete expression of a foundational principle of medical ethics: do no harm. Being an ethical professional requires taking action to prevent harm to patients in health care environments. Checklists and time-outs have become common patient safety tools in the US and other nations. While their use can support ethical practice, recent research has revealed their limitations and has underscored the importance of interpersonal collaboration in developing and using these patient safety tools. This article summarizes key research and discusses the professional and organizational ethics of patient safety, using the surgical time-out as a case study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Computer Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%