↓ Skip to main content

Lessons for Physicians from Flint’s Water Crisis

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons for Physicians from Flint’s Water Crisis
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.10.medu1-1710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A Carravallah, Lawrence A Reynolds, Susan J Woolford

Abstract

Physicians form a vital front in recognizing unusual clinical presentations that could herald a health threat. In the Flint water crisis, physicians can be credited with playing critical roles in both uncovering the crisis and providing leadership when government failed to respond effectively. Yet most physicians in Flint were not formally trained in advocacy or leadership and might have recognized the health implications of the crisis more quickly had they received formal environmental health training. Furthermore, connections to other professional disciplines-and to the community-are vital for effective responses to environmental health threats. We explore some lessons learned in Flint that might help expedite resolution of future environmental health crises, particularly those involving aging infrastructure and diminished or dysfunctional regulation or oversight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%