↓ Skip to main content

What Critical Ethical Values Guide Strategic Planning Processes in Health Care Organizations?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Critical Ethical Values Guide Strategic Planning Processes in Health Care Organizations?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, November 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.ecas1-1711
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Kucmanic, Amy R Sheon

Abstract

This case explores a fictitious hospital's use of co-creation to make a decision about redesign of inpatient units as a first step in incorporating stakeholder input into creation of governing policies. We apply a "procedural fairness" framework to reveal that conditions required for an ethical decision about space redesign were not met by using clinician and patient focus groups to obtain stakeholder input. In this article, we identify epistemic injustices resulting from this process that could undermine confidence in leadership decisions. Suggestions are offered for incorporating stakeholder input going forward that address prior shortcomings. The result should be conditions that are perceived as procedurally fair and decisions that engender confidence in institutional leadership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%