↓ Skip to main content

How Should Therapeutic Decisions about Expensive Drugs Be Made in Imperfect Environments?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Therapeutic Decisions about Expensive Drugs Be Made in Imperfect Environments?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.ecas2-1702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard M Fleck, Marion Danis

Abstract

Clinicians must inevitably make therapeutic decisions under nonideal conditions. They practice in circumstances that involve incomplete evidence. They deliver care in health care systems that are complex and poorly coordinated. Each of the patients that they take care of is unique while research offers evidence regarding relatively homogeneous populations of patients. Under these circumstances, many parties-medical scientists, reviewing agencies, insurers, and accountable care organizations-can and should contribute to optimizing the development, approval, funding, and prescription of therapies-particularly expensive and marginally beneficial therapies. In aggregate, they should aspire to achieve a pattern of fair, cost-effective therapeutic decisions to ensure a sustainable health care system. Here we offer some suggestions regarding decisions that physicians might pursue to facilitate fair and cost-effective patient care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Other 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Philosophy 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 5 20%