You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Clinicians’ Obligations to Use Qualified Medical Interpreters When Caring for Patients with Limited English Proficiency
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.3.ecas2-1703 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gaurab Basu, Vonessa Phillips Costa, Priyank Jain |
Abstract |
Access to language services is a required and foundational component of care for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). National standards for medical interpreting set by the US Department of Health and Human Services and by the National Council on Interpreting in Health Care establish the role of qualified medical interpreters in the provision of care in the United States. In the vignette, the attending physician infringes upon the patient's right to appropriate language services and renders unethical care. Clinicians are obliged to create systems and a culture that ensure quality care for patients with LEP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 48 | 55% |
Canada | 5 | 6% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 57 | 66% |
Scientists | 15 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 19% |
Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 30 | 32% |