↓ Skip to main content

Do Pediatric Patients Have a Right to Know?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Pediatric Patients Have a Right to Know?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.ecas2-1705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip M Rosoff

Abstract

In Western medicine, a central component of respecting a person's ability to make decisions governing what happens to herself is ensuring that she is provided with sufficient relevant information to make a rational choice. For patients who lack the cognitive capacity to do so because of either inborn or acquired deficits or because of youth, the extent to which they can participate in medical decisions is variable. Minors present a unique challenge, as their ability to understand and process information usually increases with age. The case presented here poses special problems because of the parents' desire to shield their child from certain information deemed important by his physicians. I consider whether minors, particularly older ones, have a right to know that supersedes their parents' wishes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Psychology 3 11%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%