↓ Skip to main content

Decreasing Smoking but Increasing Stigma? Anti-tobacco Campaigns, Public Health, and Cancer Care

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decreasing Smoking but Increasing Stigma? Anti-tobacco Campaigns, Public Health, and Cancer Care
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.msoc1-1705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen E Riley, Michael R Ulrich, Heidi A Hamann, Jamie S Ostroff

Abstract

Public health researchers, mental health clinicians, philosophers, and medical ethicists have questioned whether the public health benefits of large-scale anti-tobacco campaigns are justified in light of the potential for exacerbating stigma toward patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Although there is strong evidence for the public health benefits of anti-tobacco campaigns, there is a growing appreciation for the need to better attend to the unintended consequence of lung cancer stigma. We argue that there is an ethical burden for creators of public health campaigns to consider lung cancer stigma in the development and dissemination of hard-hitting anti-tobacco campaigns. We also contend that health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to try to mitigate stigmatizing messages of public health campaigns with empathic patient-clinician communication during clinical encounters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 26%