↓ Skip to main content

Antecedents and Consequences of Medical Students’ Moral Decision Making during Professionalism Dilemmas

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antecedents and Consequences of Medical Students’ Moral Decision Making during Professionalism Dilemmas
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.medu1-1706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn Monrouxe, Malissa Shaw, Charlotte Rees

Abstract

Medical students often experience professionalism dilemmas (which differ from ethical dilemmas) wherein students sometimes witness and/or participate in patient safety, dignity, and consent lapses. When faced with such dilemmas, students make moral decisions. If students' action (or inaction) runs counter to their perceived moral values-often due to organizational constraints or power hierarchies-they can suffer moral distress, burnout, or a desire to leave the profession. If moral transgressions are rationalized as being for the greater good, moral distress can decrease as dilemmas are experienced more frequently (habituation); if no learner benefit is seen, distress can increase with greater exposure to dilemmas (disturbance). We suggest how medical educators can support students' understandings of ethical dilemmas and facilitate their habits of enacting professionalism: by modeling appropriate resistance behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 25 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 29 48%