↓ Skip to main content

Should Long-Term Consequences of NICU Care Be Discussed in Terms of Prognostic Uncertainty or Possible Harm?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should Long-Term Consequences of NICU Care Be Discussed in Terms of Prognostic Uncertainty or Possible Harm?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.ecas1-1708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevieve Allen, Naomi Laventhal

Abstract

We will examine several ethical considerations in the resuscitation of infants born at the margin of gestational viability in analyzing a case of preterm labor. More specifically, we will discuss the obligations of physicians in characterizing expected outcomes, both mortality and long-term morbidity, for extremely premature infants and how potential adverse outcomes should be framed-as complications of prematurity itself or as iatrogenic complications of care. We will also explore how the concept of a "trial of therapy" can support parents and neonatologists in decision making concerning withholding or withdrawing care for periviable infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%