↓ Skip to main content

Continuing Medical Education and Firearm Violence Counseling

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuing Medical Education and Firearm Violence Counseling
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.stas1-1801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole D Damari, Karan S Ahluwalia, Anthony J Viera, Adam O Goldstein

Abstract

Firearm violence is a significant and increasing cause of mortality. Although physicians view firearm counseling as their professional obligation, few engage in the practice. This study examines medical education and firearm counseling among physicians in North Carolina. While 65 percent of physicians reported knowing how to counsel patients about gun safety, only 25 percent reported having conversations with patients about firearms or firearm safety often or very often. Physicians reporting continuing medical education (CME) attendance on gun safety, however, were more likely to report providing patients with firearm safety counseling and asking patients with depression about firearms. Increasing availability of and physician participation in firearm violence prevention CME could significantly increase physicians' knowledge of and engagement in firearm counseling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%