↓ Skip to main content

How Should Trainees Respond in Situations of Obstetric Violence?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
39 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Trainees Respond in Situations of Obstetric Violence?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.ecas2-1803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Rubashkin, Nicole Minckas

Abstract

Argentina passed a law for humanized birth in 2004 and another law against obstetric violence in 2009, both of which stipulate the rights of women to achieve respectful maternity care. Clinicians and women might still be unaware of these laws, however. In this article, we discuss the case of a fourth-year medical student who, while visiting Argentina from the United States for his obstetric rotation, witnesses an act of obstetric violence. We show that the student's situation can be understood as one of moral distress and argue that, in this specific instance, it would be appropriate for the student to intervene by providing supportive care to the patient. However, we suggest that medical schools have an obligation to better prepare students for rotations conducted abroad.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 38 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 41 45%