↓ Skip to main content

Facial Disfigurement and Identity: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Facial Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial Disfigurement and Identity: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Facial Transplantation
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.4.peer1-1804
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J Rifkin, Rami S Kantar, Safi Ali-Khan, Natalie M Plana, J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Manos Tsakiris, Eduardo D Rodriguez

Abstract

Facial disfigurement can significantly affect personal identity and access to social roles. Although conventional reconstruction can have positive effects with respect to identity, these procedures are often inadequate for more severe facial defects. In these cases, facial transplantation (FT) offers patients a viable reconstructive option. However, FT's effect on personal identity has been less well examined, and ethical questions remain regarding the psychosocial ramifications of the procedure. This article reviews the literature on the different roles of the face as well as psychological and social effects of facial disfigurement. The effects of facial reconstruction on personal identity are also reviewed with an emphasis on orthognathic, cleft, and head and neck surgery. Finally, FT is considered in this context, and future directions for research are explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Psychology 5 10%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 39%