↓ Skip to main content

Should Trauma Physicians Treat a Severely Injured Patient for the Sake of Elucidating Preferences about Organ Donation?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should Trauma Physicians Treat a Severely Injured Patient for the Sake of Elucidating Preferences about Organ Donation?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.ecas4-1805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra R DiBrito, Macey L Henderson

Abstract

Organ donation potential is not a motivator of care in the trauma bay, and it is ethically problematic to consider organ donor potential during the active resuscitation of a trauma patient. Despite organ donation being a public good, the role of the trauma physician is to maintain focus on the patient as an individual and to respect a patient's right to life and autonomy. This tenet of medicine is the foundation of the trust that a community and individuals must have in order for the health care system to function. Fortunately, there are guidelines and systems in place to allow physicians to care for the patient in front of them while simultaneously making morally sound decisions regarding donation in the setting of the current organ shortage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%