↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016jd025320
Authors

Piers M. Forster, Thomas Richardson, Amanda C. Maycock, Christopher J. Smith, Bjorn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Timothy Andrews, Robert Pincus, Michael Schulz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 10 7%
Professor 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 52 37%
Environmental Science 24 17%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Chemistry 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,366,731
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#674
of 5,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,679
of 322,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#19
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.