↓ Skip to main content

Selective and Potent Proteomimetic Inhibitors of Intracellular Protein–Protein Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective and Potent Proteomimetic Inhibitors of Intracellular Protein–Protein Interactions
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/anie.201410810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Barnard, Kérya Long, Heather L. Martin, Jennifer A. Miles, Thomas A. Edwards, Darren C. Tomlinson, Andrew Macdonald, Andrew J. Wilson

Abstract

Inhibition of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) represents a major challenge in chemical biology and drug discovery. α-Helix mediated PPIs may be amenable to modulation using generic chemotypes, termed "proteomimetics", which can be assembled in a modular manner to reproduce the vectoral presentation of key side chains found on a helical motif from one partner within the PPI. In this work, it is demonstrated that by using a library of N-alkylated aromatic oligoamide helix mimetics, potent helix mimetics which reproduce their biophysical binding selectivity in a cellular context can be identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 65 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,929,388
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#20,735
of 49,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,885
of 360,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#297
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.