You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hormonal Dependence and Cancer in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Care & Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acr.24068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatiana Cobo‐Ibáñez, Ana Urruticoechea‐Arana, Iñigo Rúa‐Figueroa, María A. Martín‐Martínez, Juan Gabriel Ovalles‐Bonilla, María Galindo, Jaime Calvo‐Alén, Alejandro Olivé, Antonio Fernández‐Nebro, Raúl Menor‐Almagro, Eva Tomero, Loreto Horcada, Esther Uriarte‐Itzazelaia, Víctor M. Martínez‐Taboada, José Luis Andreu, Alina Boteanu, Javier Narváez, Cristina Bohorquez, Carlos Montilla, Gregorio Santos, Blanca Hernández‐Cruz, Paloma Vela, Eva Salgado, Mercedes Freire, José Ángel Hernández‐Beriain, Elvira Díez‐Álvarez, Lorena Expósito, Olaia Fernández‐Berrizbeitia, María Luisa Velloso‐Feijoo, Mónica Ibáñez‐Barceló, Nuria Lozano‐Rivas, Gema Bonilla, Mireia Moreno, Enrique Raya, Víctor Eliseo Quevedo‐Vila, Tomas Ramón Vázquez‐Rodríguez, Jesús Ibáñez‐Ruan, Santiago Muñoz‐Fernández, Fernando Sánchez‐Alonso, José María Pego‐Reigosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 45% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Librarian | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,949,529
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Care & Research
#646
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,725
of 475,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Care & Research
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.