You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotype, treatment practice and outcome in the cobalamin‐dependent remethylation disorders and MTHFR deficiency: Data from the E‐HOD registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jimd.12041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Huemer, Daria Diodato, Diego Martinelli, Giorgia Olivieri, Henk Blom, Florian Gleich, Stefan Kölker, Viktor Kožich, Andrew A. Morris, Burkhardt Seifert, D. Sean Froese, Matthias R. Baumgartner, Carlo Dionisi‐Vici, the EHOD consortium, Carlos Alcalde Martin, Martina Baethmann, Diana Ballhausen, Javier Blasco‐Alonso, Nikolas Boy, Maria Bueno, Rosa Burgos Peláez, Roberto Cerone, Brigitte Chabrol, Kimberly A. Chapman, Maria Luz Couce, Ellen Crushell, Jaime Dalmau Serra, Luisa Diogo, Can Ficicioglu, Maria Concepcion García Jimenez, Maria Teresa García Silva, Ana Maria Gaspar, Matthias Gautschi, Domingo González‐Lamuño, Sofia Gouveia, Stephanie Grünewald, Chris Hendriksz, Mirian C. H. Janssen, Pavel Jesina, Johannes Koch, Vassiliki Konstantopoulou, Christian Lavigne, Allan M. Lund, Esmeralda G. Martins, Silvia Meavilla Olivas, Karine Mention, Fanny Mochel, Helen Mundy, Elaine Murphy, Stephanie Paquay, Consuelo Pedrón‐Giner, Maria Angeles Ruiz Gómez, Saikat Santra, Manuel Schiff, Ida Vanessa Schwartz, Sabine Scholl‐Bürgi, Aude Servais, Anastasia Skouma, Christel Tran, Inmaculada Vives Piñera, John Walter, James Weisfeld‐Adams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,443,511
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1,394
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,477
of 351,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#40
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.