You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review: Effectiveness of herbal oral care products on ventilator‐associated pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytotherapy Research, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ptr.7060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Mahdi Mashhadi Akbar Boojar, Solomon Habtemariam, Seyed Mohammad Nabavi, Atabak Najafi, Amirhosein Ghahremanian, Mohammad Baktash, Safieh Aghaabdollahian, Antoni Sureda, Mahdi Bagheri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,140,386
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Phytotherapy Research
#403
of 3,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,269
of 432,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytotherapy Research
#9
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.