You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of N95, surgical or medical, and non‐medical facemasks in protection against respiratory virus infection: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Medical Virology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rmv.2336 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Seo Kim, Dawon Seong, Han Li, Seo Kyoung Chung, Youngjoo Park, Minho Lee, Seung Won Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Jae Han Kim, Keum Hwa Lee, Marco Solmi, Elena Dragioti, Ai Koyanagi, Louis Jacob, Andreas Kronbichler, Kalthoum Tizaoui, Sarah Cargnin, Salvatore Terrazzino, Sung Hwi Hong, Ramy Abou Ghayda, Joaquim Radua, Hans Oh, Karel Kostev, Shuji Ogino, I‐Min Lee, Edward Giovannucci, Yvonne Barnett, Laurie Butler, Daragh McDermott, Petre‐Cristian Ilie, Jae Il Shin, Lee Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,563 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 173 | 11% |
| Japan | 146 | 9% |
| Canada | 47 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 2% |
| Germany | 18 | 1% |
| Spain | 15 | <1% |
| Austria | 12 | <1% |
| Brazil | 8 | <1% |
| Finland | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 103 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1005 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1453 | 93% |
| Scientists | 58 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 969. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,304
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Medical Virology
#2
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#692
of 453,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Medical Virology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.