↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements in the treatment of mental disorders: a meta‐review of meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in World Psychiatry, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
192 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements in the treatment of mental disorders: a meta‐review of meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials
Published in
World Psychiatry, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/wps.20672
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Firth, Scott B Teasdale, Kelly Allott, Dan Siskind, Wolfgang Marx, Jack Cotter, Nicola Veronese, Felipe Schuch, Lee Smith, Marco Solmi, André F Carvalho, Davy Vancampfort, Michael Berk, Brendon Stubbs, Jerome Sarris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 361 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 27 7%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 118 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 14%
Psychology 27 7%
Neuroscience 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 132 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 406. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#74,803
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from World Psychiatry
#24
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,386
of 353,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Psychiatry
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.