↓ Skip to main content

Circulating levels of calprotectin, a signature of neutrophil activation in prediction of severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter, prospective study (CalCov study)

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation Research, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating levels of calprotectin, a signature of neutrophil activation in prediction of severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter, prospective study (CalCov study)
Published in
Inflammation Research, October 2021
DOI 10.1007/s00011-021-01516-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo, Carlos Rodríguez Rojas, Daniel Morell-García, David Andaluz-Ojeda, María Dolores Rodríguez Mulero, Enrique Rodríguez-Borja, Antonieta Ballesteros-Vizoso, María Dolores Calvo, Lourdes Albert-Botella, Adela Pozo Giráldez, Isabel Llompart-Alabern, Cristina Bolado Jiménez, Marta Hernández Olivo, Lucía Fernández Presa, Juan Ortega-Pérez, María José Fora Romero, Valerio Campos-Rodríguez, Andrea Ballester Férriz, Alexandra M. Guiu-Martí, Leyre Pinilla Arribas, María Galindo Martínez, Edwin R. Puerto-Lara, Ana Belen López Tarazaga, María Salomé Ros Braquehais, Leonor Nogales Martín, Celia Juez Santamaría, Wysalli Trapiello Fernández, Virginia Espinilla Fernández, Aleksandra Havelka, María Dolores Albaladejo-Otón

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 17 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 18 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#12,907,444
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#548
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,586
of 439,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.