↓ Skip to main content

Clinical indications for image guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—part III…

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical indications for image guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—part III, nerves of the upper limb
Published in
European Radiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00330-019-06479-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Maria Sconfienza, Miraude Adriaensen, Domenico Albano, Georgina Allen, Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez, Alberto Bazzocchi, Ian Beggs, Bianca Bignotti, Vito Chianca, Angelo Corazza, Danoob Dalili, Miriam De Dea, Jose Luis del Cura, Francesco Di Pietto, Eleni Drakonaki, Fernando Facal de Castro, Dimitrios Filippiadis, Jan Gielen, Salvatore Gitto, Harun Gupta, Andrea S. Klauser, Radhesh Lalam, Silvia Martin, Carlo Martinoli, Giovanni Mauri, Catherine McCarthy, Eugene McNally, Kalliopi Melaki, Carmelo Messina, Rebeca Mirón Mombiela, Benedikt Neubauer, Marina Obradov, Cyprian Olchowy, Davide Orlandi, Raquel Prada Gonzalez, Saulius Rutkauskas, Ziga Snoj, Alberto Stefano Tagliafico, Alexander Talaska, Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska, Jelena Vucetic, David Wilson, Federico Zaottini, Marcello Zappia, Athena Plagou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,810,727
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#420
of 4,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,339
of 360,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#9
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.