↓ Skip to main content

An investigation of the interactions between an E. coli bacterial quorum sensing biosensor and chitosan-based nanocapsules

Overview of attention for article published in Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An investigation of the interactions between an E. coli bacterial quorum sensing biosensor and chitosan-based nanocapsules
Published in
Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaofei Qin, Christoph Engwer, Saaketh Desai, Celina Vila-Sanjurjo, Francisco M. Goycoolea

Abstract

We examined the interaction between chitosan-based nanocapsules (NC), with average hydrodynamic diameter ∼114-155nm, polydispersity ∼0.127, and ζ-potential ∼+50mV, and an E. coli bacterial quorum sensing reporter strain. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) allowed full characterization and assessment of the absolute concentration of NC per unit volume in suspension. By centrifugation, DLS, and NTA, we determined experimentally a "stoichiometric" ratio of ∼80 NC/bacterium. By SEM it was possible to image the aggregation between NC and bacteria. Moreover, we developed a custom in silico platform to simulate the behavior of particles with diameters of 150nm and ζ-potential of +50mV on the bacterial surface. We computed the detailed force interactions between NC-NC and NC-bacteria and found that a maximum number of 145 particles might interact at the bacterial surface. Additionally, we found that the "stoichiometric" ratio of NC and bacteria has a strong influence on the bacterial behavior and influences the quorum sensing response, particularly due to the aggregation driven by NC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Chemistry 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,996,101
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
#1,677
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,342
of 323,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.