↓ Skip to main content

Systematic analysis of the use of amphipathic polymers for studies of outer membrane proteins using mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic analysis of the use of amphipathic polymers for studies of outer membrane proteins using mass spectrometry
Published in
International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijms.2015.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G. Watkinson, Antonio N. Calabrese, Fabrice Giusti, Manuela Zoonens, Sheena E. Radford, Alison E. Ashcroft

Abstract

Membrane proteins (MPs) are essential for numerous important biological processes. Recently, mass spectrometry (MS), coupled with an array of related techniques, has been used to probe the structural properties of MPs and their complexes. Typically, detergent micelles have been employed for delivering MPs into the gas-phase, but these complexes have intrinsic properties that can limit the utility of structural studies of MPs using MS methods. Amphipols (APols) have advantages over detergent micelles and have been shown to be capable of delivering native MPs into the gas-phase. Comparing six different APols which vary in mass and charge, and the detergent n-dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside, we aimed to determine which APols are most efficient for delivery of native outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the gas-phase. We show that maintaining the solution-phase folding and global structures of three different OMPs (PagP, OmpT and tOmpA) are independent of the APol used, but differences in OMP activity can result from the different APol:OMP complexes. ESI-IMS-MS analysis of OMP:APol complexes shows that the A8-35 APol is most proficient at liberating all three OMPs into the gas-phase, without altering their gas-phase conformations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 38%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 41%
Chemistry 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mass Spectrometry
#1,706
of 2,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,832
of 294,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mass Spectrometry
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.