You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pain (03043959), December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael I. Bennett, Nadine Attal, Miroslav M. Backonja, Ralf Baron, Didier Bouhassira, Rainer Freynhagen, Joachim Scholz, Thomas R. Tölle, HansUlrich Wittchen, Troels Staehelin Jensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Slovenia | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 413 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 61 | 14% |
Researcher | 58 | 13% |
Other | 49 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 8% |
Other | 109 | 25% |
Unknown | 77 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 207 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
Psychology | 17 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 4% |
Other | 45 | 10% |
Unknown | 94 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,158,559
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#3,486
of 6,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,486
of 170,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.