You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneous FDG-guided dose-escalation for locally advanced NSCLC (the NARLAL2 trial): Design and early dosimetric results of a randomized, multi-centre phase-III study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiotherapy & Oncology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ditte Sloth Møller, Tine Bjørn Nielsen, Carsten Brink, Lone Hoffmann, Christina Maria Lutz, Mikkel Drøgemüller Lund, Olfred Hansen, Tine Schytte, Azza Ahmed Khalil, Marianne Marquard Knap, Christa Haugaard Nyhus, Wiviann Ottosson, Patrik Sibolt, Svetlana Borissova, Mirjana Josipovic, Gitte Persson, Ane Lindegaard Appelt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Bermuda | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,885,298
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#678
of 4,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,822
of 326,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#10
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.