↓ Skip to main content

Structure of the Vacuolar H+-ATPase Rotary Motor Reveals New Mechanistic Insights

Overview of attention for article published in Folding & Design, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure of the Vacuolar H+-ATPase Rotary Motor Reveals New Mechanistic Insights
Published in
Folding & Design, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.str.2014.12.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Rawson, Clair Phillips, Markus Huss, Felix Tiburcy, Helmut Wieczorek, John Trinick, Michael A. Harrison, Stephen P. Muench

Abstract

Vacuolar H(+)-ATPases are multisubunit complexes that operate with rotary mechanics and are essential for membrane proton transport throughout eukaryotes. Here we report a ∼1 nm resolution reconstruction of a V-ATPase in a different conformational state from that previously reported for a lower-resolution yeast model. The stator network of the V-ATPase (and by implication that of other rotary ATPases) does not change conformation in different catalytic states, and hence must be relatively rigid. We also demonstrate that a conserved bearing in the catalytic domain is electrostatic, contributing to the extraordinarily high efficiency of rotary ATPases. Analysis of the rotor axle/membrane pump interface suggests how rotary ATPases accommodate different c ring stoichiometries while maintaining high efficiency. The model provides evidence for a half channel in the proton pump, supporting theoretical models of ion translocation. Our refined model therefore provides new insights into the structure and mechanics of the V-ATPases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 24%
Chemistry 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#16,747,916
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Folding & Design
#2,976
of 3,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,520
of 360,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folding & Design
#39
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.