You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Naturally acquired simian retrovirus infections in central African hunters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15787-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan D Wolfe, William M Switzer, Jean K Carr, Vinod B Bhullar, Vedapuri Shanmugam, Ubald Tamoufe, A Tassy Prosser, Judith N Torimiro, Anthony Wright, Eitel Mpoudi-Ngole, Francine E McCutchan, Deborah L Birx, Thomas M Folks, Donald S Burke, Walid Heneine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 283 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,387,787
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#9,831
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,595
of 63,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#21
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.