You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, May 2005
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66545-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pierre J Guillou, Philip Quirke, Helen Thorpe, Joanne Walker, David G Jayne, Adrian MH Smith, Richard M Heath, Julia M Brown, for the MRC CLASICC trial group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Denmark | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Morocco | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 537 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 74 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 13% |
Other | 56 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 55 | 10% |
Student > Master | 55 | 10% |
Other | 160 | 29% |
Unknown | 87 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 363 | 65% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
Engineering | 13 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 4% |
Unknown | 126 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#17,534
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,526
of 70,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#53
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.