You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opportunities and priorities for breast surgical research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30511-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramsey I Cutress, Stuart A McIntosh, Shelley Potter, Amit Goyal, Cliona C Kirwan, James Harvey, Adele Francis, Amtul R Carmichael, Raghavan Vidya, Jayant S Vaidya, Patricia Fairbrother, John R Benson, Malcolm W R Reed, Association of Breast Surgery Surgical Gap Analysis Working Group, Narendra N Basu, John R Benson, Nigel J Bundred, Amtul R Carmichael, Nathan Coombs, Ramsey I Cutress, John Dickson, J Michael Dixon, Michael Douek, Patricia Fairbrother, Adele Francis, Amit Goyal, Diana Harcourt, James Harvey, Chris Holcombe, Jonathan Horsnell, Fahad M Iqbal, Lucy R Khan, Cliona C Kirwan, Daniel R Leff, Anthony J Maxwell, Stuart A McIntosh, Nicole Paraskeva, Shelley Potter, Tim Rattay, Malcolm WR Reed, Amtul S Sami, Julian Singer, Edward R St John, Ash Subramanian, Jeffrey S Tobias, Nader Touqan, Jayant S Vaidya, Raghavan Vidya, Zoe E Winters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 52% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 36% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,628,677
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#1,778
of 6,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,865
of 355,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#48
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.