You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration with definitive radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00705-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amar U Kishan, Yilun Sun, Holly Hartman, Thomas M Pisansky, Michel Bolla, Anouk Neven, Allison Steigler, James W Denham, Felix Y Feng, Almudena Zapatero, John G Armstrong, Abdenour Nabid, Nathalie Carrier, Luis Souhami, Mary T Dunne, Jason A Efstathiou, Howard M Sandler, Araceli Guerrero, David Joseph, Philippe Maingon, Theo M de Reijke, Xavier Maldonado, Ting Martin, Tahmineh Romero, Xiaoyan Wang, Matthew B Rettig, Robert E Reiter, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Michael L Steinberg, Nicholas G Nickols, Angela Y Jia, Jorge A Garcia, Daniel E Spratt, MARCAP Consortium group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 15% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 69% |
| Scientists | 15 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#66,832
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#77
of 6,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,263
of 515,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#1
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.