You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia treated with non-curative therapies: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Haematology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2352-3026(20)30374-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Pleyer, Michael Leisch, Alexandra Kourakli, Eric Padron, Jaroslaw Pawel Maciejewski, Blanca Xicoy Cirici, Jennifer Kaivers, Johanna Ungerstedt, Sonja Heibl, Peristera Patiou, Anthony Michael Hunter, Elvira Mora, Klaus Geissler, Maria Dimou, Maria-José Jimenez Lorenzo, Thomas Melchardt, Alexander Egle, Athina-Nora Viniou, Bhumika Jayantibhai Patel, Montserrat Arnan, Peter Valent, Christoforos Roubakis, Teresa Bernal Del Castillo, Athanasios Galanopoulos, Marisa Calabuig Muñoz, Nicolas Bonadies, Antonio Medina de Almeida, Jaroslav Cermak, Andrés Jerez, Maria Julia Montoro, Albert Cortés, Alejandro Avendaño Pita, Bernardo Lopez Andrade, Eva Hellstroem-Lindberg, Ulrich Germing, Mikkael Aaron Sekeres, Alan Francis List, Argiris Symeonidis, Guillermo Francisco Sanz, Julian Larcher-Senn, Richard Greil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Algeria | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 34% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 29% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,378,707
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#295
of 1,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,030
of 526,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.