You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-expandable metal stents versus endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of strictures in Crohn's disease (ProtDilat study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00386-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carme Loras, Xavier Andújar, Joan B Gornals, Vicente Sanchiz, Enric Brullet, Beatriz Sicilia, Maria Dolores Martín-Arranz, Antonio Naranjo, Jesús Barrio, Carmen Dueñas, José Ramón Foruny, David Busquets, David Monfort, Juan Ramón Pineda, Ferran González-Huix, Francisco Pérez-Roldán, Vicente Pons, Begoña González, José Reyes Moreno, Empar Sainz, Jordi Guardiola, Marta Maia Bosca-Watts, Fernando Fernández-Bañares, Vicenç Mayor, Maria Esteve, Grupo de Trabajo de Trabajo de la Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Español de Ulcerosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 35% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 34% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#726,518
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#219
of 1,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,865
of 516,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.