You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Public Health, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30254-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tingling Xu, Bingsong Wang, Hua Liu, Haidong Wang, Peng Yin, Wenlan Dong, Jianhong Li, Ya Xing Wang, Mayinuer Yusufu, Paul Briant, Nickolas Reinig, Charlie Ashbaugh, Jaimie Adelson, Theo Vos, Rupert Bourne, Ningli Wang, Maigeng Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,704,885
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#598
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,575
of 509,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#26
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 157.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.