You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Manejo y factores de riesgo de gravedad asociados a lesiones no intencionadas en urgencias de pediatría en España
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.05.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo J. Bardón Cancho, Cristina Arribas Sánchez, Arístides Rivas García, Jorge Lorente Romero, Paula Vázquez López, Rafael Marañón Pardillo, en representación de Observatorio de lesiones no intencionadas de Observatorio de lesiones no intencionadas de Observatorio de lesiones no intencionadas de Observatorio de lesiones no intencionadas de la Red de Investigación de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de del Grupo de de de Pediatría, Grupo de trabajo de lesiones no intencionadas de lesiones no intencionadas de lesiones no intencionadas de lesiones no intencionadas de la Red de Investigación de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de del Observatorio de de de Pediatría, Eduardo J. Bardón Cancho, Cristina Arribas Sánchez, Arístides Rivas García, Rafael Marañón Pardillo, Santiago M. Fernández, Santiago Mintegi, Anaida Obieta, Nuria Chaves, Claudia Farrés, Gloria Estopiñá, Fernando David Panzino, Helvia Benito, Leticia González, María Amalia Pérez, Agustín Rodríguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 75% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
#297
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,102
of 365,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.