↓ Skip to main content

Recomendaciones sobre el manejo clínico de la infección por el «nuevo coronavirus» SARS-CoV2. Grupo de trabajo de la Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP)

Overview of attention for article published in Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,164)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
948 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recomendaciones sobre el manejo clínico de la infección por el «nuevo coronavirus» SARS-CoV2. Grupo de trabajo de la Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP)
Published in
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Calvo, Milagros García López-Hortelano, Juan Carlos de Carlos Vicente, Jose Luis Vázquez Martínez, colaboradores con el de Sanidad Grupo de trabajo de Sanidad Grupo de trabajo de la Asociación Española de Pediatría para el brote de infección por Ministerio de Coronavirus, Miembros de Expertos de del Grupo la AEP, José Tomás Ramos, Fernando Baquero-Artigao, Maria Luisa Navarro, Carlos Rodrigo, Olaf Neth, Victoria Fumadó, Juan José Menendez Suso, María Slocker Barrio, Amaya Bustinza Arriortua, Iolanda Jordán García, Javier Pilar Orive

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 948 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 948 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 124 13%
Researcher 76 8%
Other 66 7%
Student > Master 64 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 6%
Other 168 18%
Unknown 397 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 10%
Engineering 37 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 3%
Social Sciences 27 3%
Other 158 17%
Unknown 410 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,467,243
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
#28
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,759
of 389,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.