You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluación del Programa Integrado de Investigación en Tuberculosis promovido por la sociedad española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica tras 11 años de funcionamiento
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archivos de Bronconeumologia, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.10.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teresa Rodrigo, José-María García-García, José A. Caminero, Juan Ruiz-Manzano, Luis Anibarro, Marta M. García-Clemente, José A. Gullón, M. Ángeles Jiménez-Fuentes, Juan F. Medina, Isabel Mir, Antón Penas, Francisca Sánchez, Maria Luiza De Souza-Galvão, Joan A. Caylà, Grupo de Trabajo del Programa Integrado de Investigación en Tuberculosis, Grupo de Trabajo del Programa Integrado de Investigación en Tuberculosis, R. Agüero, J.L. Alcázar, N. Altet, L. Altube, F. Álvarez Navascués, M. Barrón, P. Bermúdez, R. Blanquer, L. Borderías, A. Bustamante, J.L. Calpe, F. Cañas, F. Casas, X. Casas, E. Cases, R. Castrodeza, J.J. Cebrián, J.E. Ciruelos, A.E. Delgado, D. Díaz, B. Fernández, A. Fernández, J. Gallardo, M. Gallego, C. García, F.J. García, F.J. Garros, C. Hidalgo, M. Iglesias, G. Jiménez, J.M. Kindelan, J. Laparra, R. Lera, T. Lloret, M. Marín, J.T. Martínez, E. Martínez, A. Martínez, C. Melero, C. Milà, C. Morales, M.A. Morales, V. Moreno, A. Muñoz, L. Muñoz, C. Muñoz, J.A. Muñoz, I. Parra, J.A. Pérez, P. Rivas, J. Rodríguez, J. Sala, M. Sánchez, P. Sánchez, F. Sanz, M. Somoza, E. Trujillo, E. Valencia, A. Vargas, I. Vidal, R. Vidal, M.A. Villanueva, A. Villar, M. Vizcaya, M. Zabaleta, G. Zubillaga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,801,294
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de Bronconeumologia
#139
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,568
of 477,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de Bronconeumologia
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.