↓ Skip to main content

qPCR primer design revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1090 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
qPCR primer design revisited
Published in
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Bustin, Jim Huggett

Abstract

Primers are arguably the single most critical components of any PCR assay, as their properties control the exquisite specificity and sensitivity that make this method uniquely powerful. Consequently, poor design combined with failure to optimise reaction conditions is likely to result in reduced technical precision and false positive or negative detection of amplification targets. Despite the framework provided by the MIQE guidelines and the accessibility of wide-ranging support from peer-reviewed publications, books and online sources as well as commercial companies, the design of many published assays continues to be less than optimal: primers often lack intended specificity, can form dimers, compete with template secondary structures at the primer binding sites or hybridise only within a narrow temperature range. We present an overview of the main steps in the primer design workflow, with data that illustrate some of the unexpected variability that often occurs when theory is translated into practice. We also strongly urge researchers to report as much information about their assays as possible in their publications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,090 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1090 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 166 15%
Student > Master 165 15%
Student > Bachelor 165 15%
Researcher 154 14%
Other 40 4%
Other 108 10%
Unknown 292 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 291 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 4%
Environmental Science 42 4%
Other 121 11%
Unknown 324 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,307,037
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
#4
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,197
of 445,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them