You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Tracheostomy for Managing ICU Capacity During the COVID-19 Outbreak A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gonzalo Hernandez, Francisco Javier Ramos, José Manuel Añon, Ramón Ortiz, Laura Colinas, Joan Ramón Masclans, Candelaria De Haro, Alfonso Ortega, Oscar Peñuelas, María Del Mar Cruz-Delgado, Alfonso Canabal, Oriol Plans, Concepción Vaquero, Gemma Rialp, Federico Gordo, Amanda Lesmes, María Martinez, Juan Carlos Figueira, Alejandro Gomez-Carranza, Rocio Corrales, Andrea Castellvi, Beatriz Castiñeiras, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Jorge Prada, Raul De Pablo, Antonio Naharro, Juan Carlos Montejo, Claudia Diaz, Alfonso Santos-Peral, Rebeca Padilla, Judith Marin-Corral, Carmen Rodriguez-Solis, Juan Antonio Sanchez-Giralt, Jorge Jimenez, Rafael Cuena, Santiago Perez-Hoyos, Oriol Roca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 22% |
| Spain | 7 | 9% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#564,748
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#349
of 13,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,386
of 459,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#11
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.