You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regular insulin added to total parenteral nutrition vs subcutaneous glargine in non-critically ill diabetic inpatients, a multicenter randomized clinical trial: INSUPAR trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Nutrition, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Olveira, Jose Abuín, Rafael López, Sandra Herranz, Jose M García-Almeida, Katherine García-Malpartida, Mercedes Ferrer, Emilia Cancer, Luis M Luengo-Pérez, Julia Álvarez, Carmen Aragón, María J Ocón, Álvaro García-Manzanares, Irene Bretón, Pilar Serrano-Aguayo, Natalia Pérez-Ferre, Juan J López-Gómez, Josefina Olivares, Carmen Arraiza, Cristina Tejera, Jorge D Martín, Sara García, Ángel L Abad, María R Alhambra, Ana Zugasti, Juan Parra, Sara Torrejón, María J Tapia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 26 | 53% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 10% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,327,022
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#436
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,436
of 365,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#11
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.