↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of ultra-processed foods in visceral fat deposition and other adiposity indicators: Prospective analysis nested in the PREDIMED-Plus trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
131 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of ultra-processed foods in visceral fat deposition and other adiposity indicators: Prospective analysis nested in the PREDIMED-Plus trial
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jadwiga Konieczna, Marga Morey, Itziar Abete, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Jesus Vioque, Sandra Gonzalez-Palacios, Lidia Daimiel, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Miguel Fiol, Vicente Martín, Ramón Estruch, Josep Vidal, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Silvia Canudas, Antoni J. Jover, Tania Fernández-Villa, Rosa Casas, Romina Olbeyra, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Nancy Babio, Helmut Schröder, J. Alfredo Martínez, Dora Romaguera, PREDIMED-Plus investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 79 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Unspecified 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 90 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#362,756
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#126
of 3,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,746
of 532,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#7
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.